Thursday, September 4, 2014

Blog #4; Chapter 8 Structural Materials and Characteristics of Fire



            For this week’s assignment we had to either review the chapters assigned to up or Air Detective tip #14. I decided to choose chapter 8 because it is relatively associated with my topic of structural failures. When broken down to the materials utilized for building an aircraft, engineers and designers have to take in the ideas of what materials to use and specific areas that high temp materials will be utilized. Aircraft materials that are commonly utilized with aircraft construction have certain melting points and an overall temperature range that has to be adhered to. Below in Figure 1, is a reference chart of these common metals.

Figure 1. Melting Points of Common Aircraft Materials Utilized for Aircraft Construction. Adapted from “Fire Investigation.” by  R. H. Wood and R. W. Sweginnis, 2006, Aircraft accident investigation, 2nd ed., p. 67. Copyright 2006 by Endeavor Books.

Aircraft Materials

            As aircraft over time have been developed to withstand the structural forces associated with flight, a need for metals to withstand the speed and temperatures associated and thus a melting point must be higher. The author Pol Duwez (1954) stated, “This immediately imposes a drastic limit on the possibilities. Of the 92 natural elements, not more than 20 have melting points above 3,000 degrees” (p. 100). He continued to test his theories and concluded that the intrinsic property of metal cannot be altered be any means, the elements melting point is set. But, by creating chemical compounds, this could be achieved and oxides and carbides would be used for their property includes a high melting point. Now for aircraft construction theses chemical compositions would have to retain all physical strength and be chemically inert to high temperatures (Duwez, 1954). 

Composite Materials

            A composite material is the end result, a combination of different materials (non-homogenous) that make it stronger then separate individual materials. When the materials are combined especially in any metallic alloys, each separate material in the combination will retain its mechanical, chemical and physical property making it stronger, stiffer and lighter. This combination becomes a matrix and reinforcement. But composites due tend to leave engineers with headaches because of their high costs (Campbell, 2010). With those high costs, different attributes of materials to make up the composites that engineers are picky over, such as; elasticity and overall stiffness.  The overall shape and genetic makeup of the composites utilizes does help save costs though because they are well suited for certain environments and the end buyers (Michaels, 2013). 

            The two main elements that make up current aircraft structure for composites are carbon fiber and fiberglass. These two items can be utilized to make up a sandwich construction of layered non metallic or metallic core. But, it can be utilized in conjunction with each other or separately. When utilized, the aircraft becomes stronger and is more susceptible to withstand higher temperatures of fire, but at 1,200 degrees Fahrenheit it will melt. Regardless, the actual reaction of carbon fiber to fire will be depended on the resin (resin burn point is 1,100 degrees Fahrenheit or less) utilized to bond the fibers. In accordance with the authors, Wood & Sweginnis, (2006) “The temperature at which liberates the fibers or reduces their structural integrity…a characteristic frequently considered proprietary among manufacturers” (p. 66).Since it pure carbon, the fibers will melt but in general it will not decompose further. To understand more of what leading builders, Boeing and Airbus are doing to bring their jumbo jets into the future, please see figure 2 (Wood & Sweginnis, 2006).  


Figure 2. The picture depicts leading manufactures, Boeing and Airbus with their new class of jumbo jets and the genetic makeup of their fuselage (structure). Adapted from “Their New Materials: Using the latest alloys and composites is only part of the answer for today’s manufacturers.” by  D. Michaels, 2013, The wall street journal, Copyright 2013 by The Wall Street Journal.

Aluminum Alloys

            Most of aircraft taking to the skies today, their structures are comprised of 95% aluminum alloy and 5% zinc or copper and other small amounts of trace elements. When thinking about the chemical properties of the aircraft structures, the alloying elements, associated stress on the structure, exposure time, the overall temperature and the configuration (cast structure/heavy forged vs. thin layers of paneling) will determine how it will behave in a fire(Wood & Sweginnis, 2006). 

            Initial heating.   Aircraft strength can be severely jeopardized when exposed to heat. Regardless if the fire was a slow burning one that started in the cargo hold, thriving for one of the elements of fire (oxygen, fuel and heat), or a violent high temperature fire, it’s only a function of time. Time of exposure is only a guess of an assumption that engineers can determine when generating the correct chemical composition for aircraft structural materials. Testing the alloy for hardness and make temperature calculations, allows for them to predict the function of hardness loss over the specified alloy to be utilized (Wood & Sweginnis, 2006).  

            Eutectic melting.  Eutectic melting is when any of the alloying metals or other mixtures yield their lowest melting point, but some of the chemicals in the metal mixture remain a solid while the rest become a liquid (Eutectic, 2011). Once this point is reached and the alloy is extremely stressed, the “broomstraw effect” takes place. This phenomenon will resemble a green stick fracture of a bone because the fibers in the metal will show signs of delimitation in the failed area along the grain boundaries.  At the accident site, the investigator could determine that the stress was result of the impact and heating was prevalent from an in-flight fire. If a part or component is under a high stress load during the flight, heated then the “broom straw” fracture could not be 100% presumed by the investigator to prove that an in-flight fire occurred. 890 degrees Fahrenheit is aluminum alloys eutectic melting point (Wood & Sweginnis, 2006).  

            Melting.  During an accident investigation, the investigator could be mislead by structural bending of aluminum alloys because at 850 degrees Fahrenheit, it becomes plastic and will begin sagging at post impact fires. If the fire is burning hot enough, around 1,175 degrees Fahrenheit, aluminum alloy will liquefy and at this point the molten remnants will follow either gravity or if the plane is still in the air, the slipstream, see Figure 3. Investigators would be able to determine the casual factors of molten aluminum in the slipstream because tiny droplets will impinge on the structure of the aircraft. For gravity now, aluminum droplets will be larger than that of what slipstreams do (Wood & Sweginnis, 2006). 

 
Figure 3. Temperature Ranges of Metals and Aftermath Appearance. Adapted from “Fire Investigation.” by  R. H. Wood and R. W. Sweginnis, 2006, Aircraft accident investigation, 2nd ed., p. 68. Copyright 2006 by Endeavor Books.

References

Campbell, F. (2010). Structural composite materials. (p. 1). Materials Park, OH: A S M International. Retrieved from http://site.ebrary.com.ezproxy.libproxy.db.erau.edu/lib/
            erau/docDetail.action?docID=10439480
Duwez, P. (1954, September). High temperatures: Materials. Scientific American, 191(3), 
            98-106. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com.ezproxy.libproxy.db.erau.edu/
            scientificamerican/journal/v191/n3/pdf/scientificamerican0954-98.pdf
Eutectic. (2011). In The American Heritage Science Dictionary. Retrieved from http://
            ezproxy.libproxy.db.erau.edu/login?url=http://search.credoreference.com/content
            /entry/hmsciencedict/eutectic/0
Michaels, D. (2013, June 17). Their new materials using the latest alloys and composites is only part of the answer for toda'ys manufacturers. The Wall Street Journal, Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424127887323844804578530982555671760
Wood, R., & Sweginnis, R. (2006). Aircraft accident investigation. (2nd ed., pp. 61-74). Casper, WY: Endeavor Books.

No comments:

Post a Comment